That said, following are the common aspects to review each site generators: So, reviewing the site generators will be easier ( and relevant to individual needs). Hence, there’s no one site generator better than the other(s).īut, for the sake of brevity & a precise review, we need to review each site generators on common grounds. The static content ( think HTML, CSS & JS files) are then served through a CDN over the Internet. They all serve one single purpose i.e to generate static contents. Common Aspects All SSGs Should’ve (By Default)Ĭomparing one SSG with another is no easy task. So, without further ado, let’s review some of the most popular Static Site Generators, or at least the ones I used. Hence, I wanted to share my learnings & leave a detailed review of the software with my audience. It would be my unbiased opinion on how the various SSGs achieve the same goal albeit in their own way. But if there’s anything I learned from the experience. But, Hugo hasn’t disappointed me til now, so let’s see how long can I stick with it.īesides, if you read till here, you might wonder to yourself, how fickle-minded I’m. I justified my reasoning to switch often from one tool to the other further in the article. So, I made another quick switch to Pelican & used it to work with some of my first few articles.Īlas, I couldn’t stay faithful to Pelican either for long. So, I jumped ship to Gatsby & GitHub Pages which didn’t work out either! sighs. My lack of experience didn’t help either & my initial attempt to do so with Jekyll failed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |